← All research Pilly drops one pale blue block into an open blue crate that is already almost full of blocks arriving from above.

Most of what an AI says about you was written by somebody else

Your own website is roughly a quarter of it. Here is where the rest comes from.

multiple citation datasets, 2025–2026 · May 13, 2026 · 3 min read


There is a reasonable assumption behind almost every conversation we have with a business owner: that improving the website is how you improve what an AI says about you. It is a reasonable assumption and it is about a quarter right.

When we studied one city’s restaurant market, with more than 100 questions, more than 600 answers and every citation recorded, this is where those citations came from:

Out of every 100 citations, where they came from
Food and travel media                28
The restaurant's own website         28
Guides and Michelin                  21
Other                                15
Community and forums                  3
Review platforms                      2
Social media                          2

Guides and media together made up nearly half of all citations. The restaurants’ own sites, a little over a quarter.

That ratio is the single most important number for deciding where to spend, and it holds up elsewhere too. Profound’s analysis of 680 million citations found the site ChatGPT cites most is Wikipedia, at nearly 8 citations in 100, ahead of Reddit, Forbes and G2, which sit around 1 or 2. On Google’s AI Overviews the leader is Reddit, then YouTube and Quora. On Perplexity, Reddit again.

Note in passing that this kills a claim you will hear constantly: that Reddit is the most cited source across every AI platform. It leads on Perplexity and on AI Overviews. But on ChatGPT, much the largest of them, Wikipedia is four times ahead of it.

And a second finding from the same restaurant study, which tells you what kind of page gets used:

Out of every 100 citations, what kind of page it was
A food or travel feature             30
The restaurant's own site            24
A restaurant guide                   19
A best-of or ranked list             15
A review                              4
A menu or booking page                3
A forum discussion                    3

Feature articles, guides and ranked lists, all of them written about businesses by other people, take almost two thirds of the citations between them.

Why this happens is not mysterious. A model answering “who’s the best X in Y” is looking for something that already compares options. Your website compares nothing. It argues for one business. A guide, a round-up, a local newspaper feature or a directory listing all set businesses side by side, which is exactly what answering the question requires. Add what the models do to the question itself, slipping “best” into their own sub-questions about one time in six, and the preference for other people’s pages stops looking like a quirk and starts looking inevitable.

The strategic implication is awkward for anyone selling only website work, ourselves included, and we would rather say it than have you find out later. If we rebuilt your site perfectly and did nothing else, we would have improved something that accounts for roughly a quarter to a third of what a model reads about you.

So what is the other work? Four things, in the order we find them broken:

Your profile and listings. Not glamorous. But an out-of-date category, a pin in the wrong place or an unfilled services field are the most common failures we see, and they are the cheapest to fix.

The directories in your trade. Every industry has three or four that feed the answers. They will not be the ones you expect, and they turn up in the citation data of your own report, which is how we find them instead of guessing.

The “best in town” articles. These are earned, slowly, and it is the longest-running item on any plan we write. It is also, per the numbers above, where the largest single share of citations lives.

Being named without a link. Models count your business name appearing next to your category and your city in ordinary prose. The link is optional. The mention isn’t. This is the part that most confuses people who learned to get found back when links were the whole game.

One honest limit. The restaurant numbers come from one category in one city, and the mix will look different in yours. A software company gets cited through review and comparison sites far more than a restaurant gets cited through food writing. The principle carries over, the numbers do not. Which is exactly why the report goes and measures where your citations come from instead of assuming.

Related

Free scan, no card required

Now find out where your own business stands.

That was the research. The free report runs the buying questions from your industry through the AI systems and shows you who gets named instead of you.

We'll email you the report. No card, no call required to get it.